President Bush Cares More For War Than Poor Kids

OK, so I went over to cnn.com to look at headlines and the first two on the page just set me off, because they are just so wrong.

Headline 1: Budget deal would probably give Bush victory on war funding
"Democratic lawmakers and staffers privately say they're closing in on a broad budget deal that would give President Bush as much as $70 billion in new war funding."

Headline 2: President Bush vetoes child health bill again
""What a sad day that the president would say that rather than insuring [millions of] children, 'I don't want to raise the cigarette tax,' " said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi."

Does that seem a little backwards to anyone else?! Our President wants to spend $70 billion more on a war for another country but he won't allow a bill that helps poor children in the USA? That is just sad, sick, and wrong. There are millions of kids out there who cannot get the care they need and he just doesn't care. This is the second time he has vetoed that bill. Ugh, I am just so ticked off at this that I can't even think straight right now! Please tell me I am not the only person who thinks this?!